The film is set
in 1943, in a POW camp in Burma, along the route of a rail line the Japanese were
building between Malaysia and Rangoon. Seen through the eyes of Colonel Nicholson (Alec
Guinness), commanding officer of a battalion of British war prisoners,
the war narrows to a single task, building a bridge across the Kwai.
The film then focuses on exactly what the viewer considers to be mad.
For Shears, an American sailor, (William Holden), madness would be returning
to the jungle. For Col. Saito (Sessue Hayakawa), the Japanese commandant
of the camp, madness and suicide are never far away as the British build
a better bridge than his own men could. Finally for Clipton (James Donald),
the army doctor who says the final words, they could simply mean that
the final violent confusion led to unnecessary death.
Nicholson and
Saito, the commandant, are quickly involved in a face off. Saito wants
all of the British to work on the bridge. Nicholson says the Geneva
Convention states officers may not be forced to perform manual labour.
He even produces a copy of the document, which Saito uses to whip him
across the face, drawing blood. Nicholson is prepared to die rather
than bend on principle, and eventually, in one of the film's best-known
sequences, he's locked inside ‘the Oven’, a corrugated iron hut that
stands in the sun.
The story in the
jungle moves ahead neatly, economically and powerfully. There is a parallel
story involving Shears, following his escape, is taken to a hospital
in British occupied Ceylon, drinks martinis and frolics with a nurse,
and then is asked by Major Warden (Jack Hawkins) to return as part of
a commando team to blow up the bridge. Holden is extremely good as the
malingerer and unlikely hero – you see his character come full circle
as the film ends. Note should be made of Hawkins brilliant, perhaps
his finest role, as the focused British commando. With all Hawkins military
characters you really have faith that he is who he plays. The long march
where he refuses to be carried is a good example of the stiff upper
lipism that he carries so well. He and Holden handle the British humour
well with Hawkins providing lines such as
‘Jolly
good show’ to which Holden replies ‘yes jolly good show, jolly jolly
good…good hunting’
in perhaps the
most humorous moment of the film.
The film's central
relationship is between Saito and Nicholson, a professional soldier
approaching his 28th anniversary of army service
‘I
don't suppose I've been at home more than 10 months in all that time’.
The Japanese colonel is not a professional soldier, but he is a rigidly
dutiful officer. We see him weeping privately with humiliation because
Nicholson is a stronger willed man – a great insult to a Japanese
officer.
Most
war movies are either for or against their wars. This film is one of
the few that focuses not on rights and wrongs but on the individuals.
Like Robert Graves' World War I memoir 'Goodbye to All That' it shows
men grimly hanging onto military discipline and pride in their units
as a way of clinging to sanity. By the end of the film we are less interested
in who wins than in how individual characters will behave.
The
scenes in the jungle are crisply told. We see the bridge being built,
and we watch the standoff between the two colonels. Hayakawa and Guinness
make a good match as they create two disciplined officers who never
bend, but nevertheless quietly share the vision of completing the bridge.